COP31: Overshoot Narrative and Climate Action Challenges
COP31 in Türkiye debates the 1.5°C overshoot narrative amid extreme weather and energy crises. Learn its implications for climate finance and global.
- GS 3: Environment and Ecology
- GS-III Environment and Ecology
- GS-II International Relations
The Hindu
10
mins Reading time
Add a comment

Join our WhatsApp Community
Why in the News?
COP31, the 31st Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC, began in Antalya, Türkiye. Discussions include accepting a temporary breach of the 1.5°C threshold amid global climate crises.
Key Highlights
The term 1.5°C overshoot refers to temporarily exceeding the 1.5°C limit and returning to it by 2100.
Developed nations like the United States and Norway continue approving fossil-fuel projects, including Arctic exploration.
Reported $137 billion in climate finance for 2024 had an actual value of only $33-45 billion, mostly loans.
Adaptation finance declined to $26 billion in 2023, far below annual needs of $310-365 billion by 2035.
UNEP estimates reversing 0.1°C of warming requires removing 220 billion tonnes of CO₂ permanently.
Developed countries must achieve net-negative emissions within their borders, avoiding reliance on Global South resources.
Know the Basics
UNFCCC: A 1992 treaty aimed at stabilising greenhouse gas concentrations to prevent dangerous interference with the climate system.
Paris Agreement: A 2015 global pact under UNFCCC to limit warming to below 2°C, ideally 1.5°C, above pre-industrial levels.
Carbon Budget: The maximum allowable CO₂ emissions to limit global temperature rise to a specific target.
Climate Finance: Funds provided to developing countries for mitigation and adaptation under Article 9 of the Paris Agreement.
Detailed Analysis
1.5°C Overshoot Risks Delaying Immediate Action
The overshoot narrative originates in climate modelling and may rhetorically preserve the 1.5°C target while diverting focus from urgent emissions cuts.
Scientific uncertainties include whether CO₂ removal can reverse warming proportionately or at the same rate as emissions caused it.
Fossil-Fuel Dependency in Developed Nations
Fossil fuels constituted 83% of primary energy use in the United States and 73% in the European Union in 2025.
Countries like the United States, Norway, and Australia continue approving new fossil-fuel projects, undermining global climate goals.
Climate Finance and Adaptation Challenges
Climate finance reported by developed countries often includes loans, with actual grant-based support far below pledged amounts.
Adaptation finance is insufficient, penalising developing countries while mechanisms like CBAM disadvantage their industrialisation.
Carbon Removal Feasibility and Equity Issues
UNEP estimates reversing 0.1°C of warming requires removing CO₂ equivalent to five years of current emissions, with unclear financing and land allocation.
Developed countries rely on Global South land for carbon removal, threatening food security and livelihoods.
Accountability and Global Carbon Budget Transparency
No COP decision has quantified the remaining global carbon budget or identified historical overuse by developed countries.
Developed nations must achieve net-negative emissions within their borders rather than relying on offsets in developing countries.
Significance for India
India can advocate predictable, grant-based climate finance under Article 9 of the Paris Agreement.
India's renewable energy targets align with global calls for reducing fossil-fuel dependency.
UPSC could test this topic under international climate negotiations or carbon budget implications.
India's role in balancing development needs with climate commitments highlights the equity dimension of global climate policies.
Challenges
The overshoot narrative risks delaying immediate emissions cuts and accountability by developed nations.
Climate finance remains inadequate, with developed countries retreating from their obligations under Article 9.1 of the Paris Agreement.
Carbon removal technologies face scientific uncertainties, high costs, and equity concerns over land use in developing countries.
Intellectual-property barriers prevent affordable access to climate technologies for developing nations.
Way Forward
Developed countries must achieve net-negative emissions within their borders and increase grant-based climate finance.
UNFCCC should quantify the global carbon budget and ensure transparency in historical emissions and overshoot pathways.
UNEP and COP31 must address equity concerns in carbon removal, including land use and food security in developing nations.
Countries should eliminate intellectual-property barriers to climate technologies, ensuring fair access for all.
PYQs (Prelims)
Question 1 of 3
Your Score: 0/3
Prelims Practice Quiz
Consider the following statements about COP31:
How many of the above statements are correct?
- 1The term '1.5°C overshoot' refers to permanently exceeding the 1.5°C limit by 2100.
- 2Developed countries reported $137 billion in climate finance for 2024, mostly provided as loans.
- 3Adaptation finance in 2023 met the estimated annual needs of $310-365 billion.
Frequently Asked Questions
Have questions about this article? Find answers to everything you need to know.
Add as a preferred Source on Google
No comments yet. Be the first to join the discussion!



















