Indian National Movement Phase I (1885-1917) UPSC
Indian national movement Phase I (1885-1917) covers the founding of the INC, Moderate and Extremist phases, Partition of Bengal, Swadeshi, Surat Split, Morley-Minto Reforms, Home Rule and Champaran. Full UPSC notes with timeline, PYQs and FAQs.
Gajendra Singh Godara
Last updated
12
mins read
The Indian national movement is one of the single highest-weightage topics in UPSC Modern History. Phase I, running from the founding of the Indian National Congress in 1885 to Champaran Satyagraha in 1917, is where it all begins. These 32 years take the story from polite tea-table petitions to the first mass movement, Gandhi's arrival in Indian politics and the first serious Hindu-Muslim political handshake at Lucknow.
If you are preparing for UPSC Prelims or Mains, Phase I usually produces at least one direct question every two years. For the Mains GS Paper I syllabus on "Modern Indian history from about the middle of the eighteenth century until the present", this phase is the bridge between the Revolt of 1857 and the Gandhian era. For state PCS and SSC exams, the facts in this guide (dates, leaders, Acts, movements) are near-permanent fixtures.
The Indian National Congress was founded on 28 December 1885 in Bombay by Allan Octavian Hume; W.C. Bonnerjee presided over the first session of 72 delegates.
The Moderate Phase (1885-1905) worked through petitions, prayers and economic critique; Dadabhai Naoroji gave the famous Drain of Wealth theory in Poverty and Un-British Rule in India (1901).
The Partition of Bengal (1905) by Lord Curzon triggered the Swadeshi and Boycott movement and the rise of the Extremist Phase (1905-1917).
Lal-Bal-Pal — Lala Lajpat Rai, Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Bipin Chandra Pal — demanded Swaraj as self-rule, not just reform.
The Surat Split (1907) divided the INC into Moderates and Extremists.
The All India Muslim League was founded in Dhaka on 30 December 1906; the Morley-Minto Reforms (1909) introduced separate electorates for Muslims.
The Ghadar Party (1913) and the Komagata Maru incident (1914) mark the arrival of revolutionary nationalism abroad.
The Home Rule Leagues (1916) of Tilak and Annie Besant and the Lucknow Pact (December 1916) reunited Indian politics.
Champaran Satyagraha (1917) marks the entry of Mahatma Gandhi into mass Indian politics.
Join our WhatsApp Community
The Indian national movement did not fall out of the sky in 1885. By the 1880s, India had been simmering for three decades after the Revolt of 1857. Several forces came together to make an organised national platform not just possible but inevitable.
Political and administrative discontent. The 1857 revolt had been crushed, but its memory lived on. The post-1858 Crown administration treated Indians as subjects, not citizens. The Ilbert Bill controversy (1883-84), where European planters in India opposed Indian judges trying them, revealed British racism in bare form and shook even loyalist Indians.
Economic exploitation. The deindustrialisation of India, high land revenue, famines (notably the Great Famine of 1876-78 that killed over 5 million people), and the systematic transfer of wealth to Britain, articulated as the Drain of Wealth by Dadabhai Naoroji and R.C. Dutt, built a shared economic grievance.
Rise of modern education and a new middle class. English-educated lawyers, teachers, journalists and civil servants, concentrated in Bombay, Calcutta and Madras, formed the intellectual base of the movement.
Socio-religious reform movements. The Brahmo Samaj, Arya Samaj, Ramakrishna Mission, Aligarh Movement and Theosophical Society gave Indians a renewed sense of self-respect and cultural confidence.
The Indian press. Newspapers such as The Hindu, Amrita Bazar Patrika, Bengalee, Kesari and Mahratta carried political ideas and critique across linguistic regions.
The 1857 memory. The uprising had failed, but it reminded both rulers and the ruled that India could rise.
Against this backdrop, a retired British civil servant, Allan Octavian Hume, played the catalyst.
The table below is the single most compact revision summary of Phase I.
Year | Event / Movement | Leader(s) | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
1885 | Formation of Indian National Congress | A.O. Hume, W.C. Bonnerjee, Dadabhai Naoroji | Birth of organised nationalism |
1892 | Indian Councils Act 1892 | Lord Lansdowne | Mild expansion of legislative councils |
1896-1901 | Famines and plague; critique by Naoroji | Dadabhai Naoroji | Drain of Wealth theory formalised |
1905 | Partition of Bengal | Lord Curzon | Trigger for Swadeshi and Extremism |
1905 | Swadeshi and Boycott movement | Tilak, Lajpat Rai, Pal, Aurobindo | First mass mobilisation |
1906 | All India Muslim League founded, Dhaka | Aga Khan III, Nawab Salimullah | Separate Muslim political platform |
1907 | Surat Split of INC | Moderates vs Extremists; Rash Behari Ghosh | INC divided into two camps |
1909 | Morley-Minto Reforms (Indian Councils Act 1909) | Lord Minto; John Morley | Separate electorates for Muslims |
1911 | Annulment of Bengal Partition, capital shifted to Delhi | George V, Lord Hardinge | Partial moderate victory |
1913 | Ghadar Party founded in San Francisco | Lala Hardayal, Sohan Singh Bhakna | Revolutionary nationalism abroad |
1914 | Komagata Maru incident | Gurdit Singh | Anti-British anger among expatriates |
1915 | Return of Gandhi from South Africa | Mahatma Gandhi | New phase of mass politics on horizon |
1916 | Home Rule Leagues (Tilak, April; Besant, September) | Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Annie Besant | Demand for self-government within Empire |
1916 | Lucknow Pact (joint INC + Muslim League session) | Tilak, Jinnah, Ambika Charan Mazumdar | Reunion of Moderates & Extremists; INC-ML understanding |
1917 | Champaran Satyagraha | Mahatma Gandhi, Rajkumar Shukla | First Gandhian Satyagraha on Indian soil |
Add as a preferred Source on Google
The Indian National Congress was founded on 28 December 1885 at the Gokuldas Tejpal Sanskrit College in Bombay (Mumbai). The first session had 72 delegates from across the country and was presided over by Womesh Chandra (W.C.) Bonnerjee, a Calcutta-based barrister.
The two architects:
Allan Octavian Hume, a retired British civil servant and ornithologist, is widely credited as the formal founder. His 1883 open letter to the graduates of Calcutta University called for an all-India political body.
Dadabhai Naoroji — often called the Grand Old Man of India — gave the Congress its intellectual spine and was later the first Indian elected to the British House of Commons (1892).
Early objectives (first session, 1885):
Promote friendly relations between nationalist workers from different parts of the country.
Develop and consolidate the feeling of national unity.
Discuss and formulate political demands.
Train and organise public opinion in India.
Build an all-India political platform cutting across religion, region and language.
One historiographical note worth remembering for Mains: Historian R.P. Dutt famously called the INC a "safety valve" planned by Hume to divert emerging Indian discontent. Later historians such as Bipan Chandra have strongly rejected this, arguing that Hume and the early leaders were serious democrats, not British agents. UPSC loves this "safety valve vs lightning conductor" debate.
The first two decades of the Indian national movement were led by a generation of English-educated, constitutionalist nationalists usually called the Moderates. They believed British rule was fundamentally reformable and that India's path to self-government lay through loyal, patient and persistent political work.
Who were the leading Moderates?
Dadabhai Naoroji — three-time INC president (1886, 1893, 1906), author of Poverty and Un-British Rule in India (1901).
Gopal Krishna Gokhale — Gandhi's self-declared political guru, founder of the Servants of India Society (1905).
Pherozeshah Mehta — "Uncrowned King of Bombay".
Surendranath Banerjee — called the "Rashtraguru"; editor of The Bengalee.
W.C. Bonnerjee — first INC president.
M.G. Ranade, Dinshaw Wacha, Badruddin Tyabji (first Muslim INC president, 1887).
Methods of the Moderates (the famous "3 Ps"):
Prayers, petitions and protests addressed to the British Parliament and public.
Memoranda and delegations to England to influence British public opinion.
Articles in the Indian and British press.
Faith in the "British sense of justice".
Major demands:
Greater Indian representation in legislative councils.
Separation of judiciary and executive.
Reduction of military expenditure.
Protection of Indian industries.
Simultaneous ICS examinations in India and England.
The Drain of Wealth theory:
Dadabhai Naoroji's most important contribution was the Drain Theory: the idea that India's wealth was being systematically transferred to Britain through salaries, pensions, home charges, railway profits, interest on debt and unequal trade. This was a direct intellectual challenge to the British claim that colonial rule benefited India.
Indian Councils Act 1892:
The Moderates' first big legislative gain. The Act expanded the Imperial Legislative Council and the provincial councils, allowed Indian members to discuss (not vote on) the budget, and allowed indirect elections for the first time. In practice, powers remained very limited, which later gave Extremists their main ammunition against the Moderate approach.
If one date divides Phase I into two halves, it is 16 October 1905 — the day the Partition of Bengal came into effect.
Who announced it: Viceroy Lord Curzon, on 19 July 1905.
What happened: Bengal was divided into two provinces — "Bengal" (Hindu-majority, with Bihar and Orissa) and "Eastern Bengal and Assam" (Muslim-majority, with capital at Dhaka).
Stated reason: Administrative convenience; the old Bengal Presidency was indeed too large.
Real reason: Divide and rule, and specifically to weaken the growing nationalist consciousness in Bengal by splitting Hindus and Muslims along provincial lines.
The reaction:
16 October 1905 was observed as a day of mourning; people tied rakhis on each other's wrists as a symbol of Hindu-Muslim unity, a programme suggested by Rabindranath Tagore.
Shops downed shutters, students stayed away from classes, and the song Amar Sonar Bangla (now Bangladesh's national anthem) was written as a protest.
Tagore's famous poem Banglar Mati Banglar Jol ("Soil of Bengal, Water of Bengal") was composed for the day.
The outcome:
The Partition triggered the Swadeshi and Boycott movement and gave the Extremists their moment.
Faced with sustained mass protest, the British finally annulled the Partition in 1911 at the Delhi Durbar, when the capital was also shifted from Calcutta to Delhi.
The annulment was celebrated as a major Moderate-era victory, but by then the Extremist genie was already out of the bottle.
The Swadeshi Movement was the first mass political movement in Indian history and the first time Indian nationalism acquired a visible economic programme.
What it meant:
Swadeshi: use of goods and services produced in India.
Boycott: rejection of British-made goods, services and institutions.
Atma-Shakti (self-reliance): build Indian capacity in industry, education and governance.
Key programmes that emerged:
Swadeshi enterprises: indigenous textile mills, soap factories, match-making units, banks and insurance houses were started. The Bengal Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works (founded by Acharya P.C. Ray in 1901) got a big push.
Boycott of British goods: Manchester cloth, Liverpool salt and British sugar were set aside; bonfires of foreign cloth became iconic.
National education: The National Council of Education was set up on 15 August 1906; Bengal National College was started with Aurobindo Ghosh as its principal.
Cultural revival: festivals like Ganesh Utsav and Shivaji Jayanti (promoted earlier by Tilak) became platforms for mass mobilisation.
Women, students and workers joined political action for the first time in a serious way.
Why it mattered:
It shifted nationalism from the drawing room to the street.
It gave Indian industry its first political boost.
It handed the Extremists their winning method — mass action, not just petitions.
It also saw the Moderate–Extremist tension inside the INC come to a head, culminating in the Surat Split of 1907.
The period after the Partition of Bengal belonged to a younger, more impatient generation of leaders who felt the Moderates had asked politely for too long and gained too little. They are usually called Extremists, though assertive nationalists or radicals is the fairer term.
The Lal-Bal-Pal trio:
Lala Lajpat Rai of Punjab — later known for leading the Simon Commission protest in Lahore in 1928.
Bal Gangadhar Tilak of Maharashtra — editor of Kesari (Marathi) and Mahratta (English); famous for the slogan "Swaraj is my birthright and I shall have it."
Bipin Chandra Pal of Bengal — orator, editor of Bande Mataram, often called the "Father of Revolutionary Thought".
Alongside them stood Aurobindo Ghosh, whose essays in Bande Mataram and New Lamps for Old gave the movement much of its ideological fire.
How the Extremists differed from the Moderates:
Goal: Swaraj or self-rule, not just reform within the Empire.
Faith: little faith in the "British sense of justice"; British rule was seen as inherently exploitative.
Method: mass mobilisation, boycott, passive resistance, direct action.
Idiom: proudly used Indian cultural and religious symbols (Shivaji, Ganesh, Bharat Mata) to connect with the common people.
Base: moved beyond lawyers and bureaucrats to include students, youth, peasants and small-town traders.
Key newspapers of the Extremists:
Newspaper | Year | Editor / Leader |
|---|---|---|
Kesari (Marathi) | 1881 | Bal Gangadhar Tilak |
Mahratta (English) | 1881 | Bal Gangadhar Tilak |
Bande Mataram (English) | 1906 | Bipin Chandra Pal, Aurobindo Ghosh |
Yugantar (Bengali) | 1906 | Bardra Kumar Ghosh |
Punjabee | 1904 | Lala Lajpat Rai (associated) |
The Four Pillars of the Early Extremist Programme
For a quick revision snapshot, the Extremist (assertive nationalist) programme between 1905 and 1917 can be summed up in four pillars. UPSC Prelims often tests one of these in an either/or MCQ.
Pillar | What it meant | Example |
|---|---|---|
Swadeshi | Use of Indian-made goods and services | Bengal Chemical Works; indigenous textile mills |
Boycott | Rejection of British goods, courts, schools and titles | Public bonfires of British cloth |
National Education | Indian-run schools and colleges outside the colonial system | Bengal National College (1906); National Council of Education |
Passive Resistance | Non-cooperation with the government in all forms short of violence | Non-payment of taxes, refusal to attend durbars |
These four pillars became the template on which Gandhi later built the much larger Non-Cooperation Movement of 1920-22.
The Surat Split (1907)
By 1906-07, the fault line between Moderates and Extremists inside the Congress had become hard to paper over. It finally snapped at the Surat session in December 1907.
What happened at Surat:
The Moderates proposed Rash Behari Ghosh as president; the Extremists wanted Lala Lajpat Rai or Bal Gangadhar Tilak.
The two sides also clashed on whether to carry forward the Calcutta session's (1906) resolutions on Swadeshi, Boycott, National Education and Swaraj, which the Moderates wanted to dilute.
Shouting matches, flying chairs and shoes brought the session to an abrupt end on 27 December 1907.
The Extremists walked out; the Congress effectively split into two factions.
Aftermath:
For the next nine years, the INC was dominated by the Moderates, while the Extremists worked largely outside it.
Tilak was tried for sedition in 1908 and sent to Mandalay (Burma) for six years.
The two factions reunited at the Lucknow session in 1916, aided by Annie Besant and the Home Rule campaign.
The Surat Split is a UPSC favourite because it is a textbook case of ideology, personality and tactics all breaking apart at once.
Rise of Communal Politics: Muslim League (1906) and Morley-Minto Reforms (1909)
All India Muslim League (30 December 1906, Dhaka):
Founded by Nawab Salimullah of Dhaka and other Muslim leaders at the All India Muhammadan Educational Conference in Dhaka.
The Simla Deputation of October 1906, led by Aga Khan III, had just met Viceroy Minto demanding separate political representation for Muslims; the League was its organisational outcome.
Initial objectives: protect Muslim political rights, promote loyalty to the British Crown, and prevent the growth of hostility toward other communities.
The League's role would deepen over the next four decades, culminating in the demand for Pakistan.
Morley-Minto Reforms (Indian Councils Act 1909):
Named after John Morley (Secretary of State for India) and Lord Minto (Viceroy).
Enlarged the Imperial Legislative Council from 16 to 60 members and the provincial councils as well.
Allowed election (indirect) of some members for the first time.
Permitted members to discuss the budget, move resolutions and ask supplementary questions.
Crucially, introduced separate electorates for Muslims — Muslim voters alone could elect Muslim members. This was the first legal recognition of communal electorates in Indian history.
Added one Indian member to the Viceroy's Executive Council (Satyendra Prasanna Sinha became the first in 1909).
Why it matters for UPSC:
The Morley-Minto Reforms are often tested as the Act that sowed the seed of communalism in the Indian political system, a point historians have debated ever since. Separate electorates would be expanded under the Government of India Act 1919 and 1935, and remain the single most consequential constitutional precedent of this phase.
Revolutionary Nationalism Abroad: Ghadar Party (1913) and Komagata Maru (1914)
While the INC was arguing with itself over methods, a parallel stream of revolutionary nationalism was taking shape, both inside India and overseas.
Inside India:
Anushilan Samiti (Bengal, early 1900s) and Jugantar engaged in revolutionary planning, assassinations and bomb-making.
In Maharashtra, V.D. Savarkar's Abhinav Bharat Society (1904) worked along similar lines.
Famous incidents include the Alipore Bomb Case (1908) that saw Aurobindo Ghosh arrested and the Khudiram Bose execution (also 1908).
Ghadar Party (San Francisco, July 1913):
Founded by Sohan Singh Bhakna as president and Lala Hardayal as its intellectual leader.
Based among Indian immigrants on the US Pacific coast, with heavy Punjabi Sikh participation.
Published the newspaper Ghadar in multiple Indian languages.
Called for an armed revolt in India, especially in the Punjab, by Indian soldiers in the British Indian Army.
Planned to use World War I as the moment to launch an uprising in February 1915, but the plot was betrayed and the rising collapsed.
Komagata Maru Incident (1914):
A Japanese steamship chartered by Punjabi businessman Gurdit Singh carried 376 Indian passengers (mostly Sikhs) from Hong Kong to Vancouver.
Canadian authorities refused entry under racist "continuous journey" immigration rules.
After months stranded in Vancouver harbour, the ship was turned back; on reaching Budge Budge, near Calcutta, on 29 September 1914, British police opened fire, killing many passengers.
The incident became a potent symbol of British racism and fed the Ghadar Party's call for armed revolt.
For UPSC, remember: the revolutionary stream of Phase I is small in numbers but very big in symbolic value, especially for Mains answers on the "many streams of Indian nationalism".
Home Rule Movement (1916-1918)
By 1916, World War I had been raging for two years and India had sent over a million soldiers and massive supplies to the British war effort. In return, Indians wanted a concrete promise of self-government. The Home Rule Movement was born out of this expectation.
The two Home Rule Leagues:
League | Founded by | Date | Headquarters | Area of operation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Indian Home Rule League | Bal Gangadhar Tilak | April 1916 | Pune | Maharashtra, Karnataka, Central Provinces, Berar |
Home Rule League | Annie Besant | September 1916 | Madras | Rest of India |
Why two leagues? Tilak and Besant agreed on the goal but preferred separate structures to avoid stepping on each other's toes. Both leagues coordinated closely.
Core demand: Home Rule or self-government for India within the British Empire, modelled on the Irish Home Rule movement.
Methods:
Mass meetings, lectures, public pamphlets and newspapers.
Enrolling members, including students, women and small-town professionals.
Pushing the Indian National Congress to adopt stronger demands.
Impact:
The leagues built a durable national network of almost 60,000 members at their peak.
They prepared public opinion for the August Declaration (1917) by Montagu, which for the first time promised "gradual development of self-governing institutions" in India.
They helped bring the Extremists back into the INC in 1916.
Annie Besant was briefly interned (1917), which created national outrage and further boosted the movement.
She went on to become the first woman president of the Indian National Congress at the Calcutta session, 1917.
The Home Rule Movement is often described as the bridge between the Extremist Phase and the Gandhian Era.
Lucknow Pact (December 1916)
The Lucknow Pact was signed at the joint session of the Indian National Congress and the All India Muslim League at Lucknow in December 1916. It is one of the most important political agreements of Phase I.
Context:
The INC president at Lucknow was Ambika Charan Mazumdar; the Muslim League session was presided over by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, then a Congress leader often called the "ambassador of Hindu-Muslim unity".
The Extremists (Tilak) and Moderates (Gokhale had died in 1915) had come back together in the Congress; the Home Rule Leagues had built pressure.
Key agreements:
The INC accepted the principle of separate electorates for Muslims, which the Morley-Minto Reforms (1909) had introduced.
Both bodies demanded self-government for India at an early date.
They agreed on a joint scheme of political reform to be presented to the British, including expansion of legislative councils, more Indian members in the executive, and provincial autonomy.
Weightage was given to Muslims in provinces where they were a minority and to Hindus in Muslim-majority provinces.
Why it matters:
First serious political handshake between the INC and the Muslim League.
Showed that a joint Hindu-Muslim front against colonial rule was possible.
But by accepting separate electorates, the Congress also legitimised a principle that would later make partition politics much harder to roll back.
The Lucknow Pact is a classic UPSC Mains question on "how far was Hindu-Muslim unity in Phase I of the national movement a tactical arrangement rather than a strategic one?"
Champaran Satyagraha (1917): The Gandhian Transition
If the Partition of Bengal opened Phase I, the Champaran Satyagraha of 1917 closed it and opened the door to the Gandhian Era. It was Mahatma Gandhi's first Satyagraha on Indian soil.
Background:
In Champaran district of Bihar, indigo cultivators had been forced for decades to grow indigo on three-twentieths (3/20) of their land under the tinkathia system imposed by European planters.
Synthetic (German) dyes had collapsed indigo prices, but the planters simply shifted the burden onto Indian cultivators through higher rents and fines.
Rajkumar Shukla, a local peasant, met Gandhi at the Lucknow Congress session (1916) and persuaded him to visit Champaran.
The Satyagraha:
Gandhi arrived in Champaran in April 1917 and immediately began recording peasant grievances.
He was served notice to leave; he refused, and announced he was willing to face arrest. The notice was withdrawn.
A Champaran Agrarian Enquiry Committee was set up with Gandhi as one of its members.
The committee's findings led to the Champaran Agrarian Act of 1918, which abolished the tinkathia system and gave partial relief to the peasants.
Significance:
Gandhi's method of Satyagraha, developed in South Africa, was proved on Indian soil for the first time.
Showed that non-violent civil resistance could win concrete gains against a mighty British state.
Introduced Gandhi to Rajendra Prasad, J.B. Kripalani, Mazharul Haq and Brajkishore Prasad, who would later form the core of his Bihar team.
Marked the formal transition from Phase I to the Gandhian Era of mass politics.
Moderates vs Extremists: Side-by-Side
For Prelims, this comparison table alone has repeatedly delivered one or two mark question. For Mains, it anchors a structured answer on "continuity and change" in the Indian national movement.
Image 3 suggestion — Infographic: "Moderates vs Extremists at a Glance".
Parameter | Moderates (1885-1905) | Extremists (1905-1917) |
|---|---|---|
Social base | English-educated urban elite; lawyers, bureaucrats, professors | Students, youth, small-town traders, peasants, workers |
Goal | Reforms within the British Empire; eventually Dominion Status | Swaraj (self-rule) as birthright |
Method | Petitions, prayers, memoranda, delegations | Mass agitation, boycott, passive resistance, direct action |
Faith in British | High — "British sense of justice" | Low — British rule as exploitative |
Economic critique | Drain of Wealth theory (Naoroji) | Deepened Drain theory; added Swadeshi programme |
Idiom | Secular, constitutional, English | Cultural, religious, Indian-language |
Key leaders | Dadabhai Naoroji, Gokhale, Mehta, Banerjee, Ranade, Bonnerjee | Tilak, Lajpat Rai, Pal, Aurobindo Ghosh |
Key newspapers | The Hindu, Bengalee, Amrita Bazar Patrika | Kesari, Mahratta, Bande Mataram, Yugantar |
Key moment | Indian Councils Act 1892; Drain Theory book 1901 | Swadeshi Movement 1905; Surat Split 1907 |
Role of religion | Minimal | Open use of Hindu symbols (Shivaji, Ganesh, Bharat Mata) |
Outcomes of Phase I of the Indian National Movement
Independence was still 30 years away in 1917, but Phase I had already achieved a surprising amount:
Built a national organisation. The INC had become the recognised political voice of Indian aspirations across religion, region and language.
Developed the economic case against colonial rule. The Drain Theory had made British claims of "benevolent rule" much harder to defend.
Produced a mass vocabulary of resistance. Swadeshi, Boycott, Swaraj, Satyagraha, National Education and Passive Resistance all entered the Indian political dictionary in this phase.
Won real reforms. The Indian Councils Acts of 1892 and 1909 and the Montagu Declaration of 1917 would not have come without the Moderates' and Extremists' combined pressure.
Set up communal fault lines. Separate electorates (1909) and the formation of the Muslim League (1906) planted politics on communal lines that Phase II would struggle to contain.
Linked Indian nationalism to global anti-colonial networks. The Ghadar Party, Komagata Maru and Madam Bhikaji Cama's work in Paris and London tied Indian nationalism to a wider anti-imperial world.
Produced Gandhi's political debut on Indian soil. By 1917, the leader who would dominate Phase II was already in Champaran.
Phase I did not win independence. But it built the organisation, the ideology and the mass base without which Phase II could not have delivered independence in 1947.
UPSC Relevance: Prelims, Mains and Beyond
Stage | Focus Area |
|---|---|
Prelims | Formation of INC (year, place, founders), Partition of Bengal, Swadeshi, Surat Split, Morley-Minto, Lucknow Pact, Champaran, Lal-Bal-Pal, Dadabhai Naoroji, Gokhale, Home Rule leagues |
Mains GS Paper I | Modern Indian history — Role of INC, Moderate vs Extremist methods, Partition of Bengal, Swadeshi, communalism and separate electorates |
Mains Essay | India's democratic journey, soft power and non-violence, role of leadership in nation-building |
Optional (History) | Section on "Rise of Indian nationalism" — Early phase, Moderates, Militant nationalism, Revolutionary movements |
Interview | Short, confident answers on INC's foundation, Phase I turning points, India's early tryst with constitutionalism |
Related read: Keep this guide alongside the padhai.ai Modern History hub and the UPSC Mains Answer Writing Practice page.
Frequently asked question (FAQs)
When and where was the Indian National Congress founded?
Who were the Moderates and who were the Extremists in the Indian National Movement?
What was the Surat Split and what caused it?
What is the Lucknow Pact of 1916?
Who led the Home Rule Movement in India?
Phase I of the Indian national movement is really the story of how a small group of English-educated reformers, by 1917, had transformed into a country-wide political movement with mass base, Hindu-Muslim handshake, revolutionary wing abroad, newspaper network at home, and a brand new leader (Gandhi) ready to take over.
For UPSC answers, three habits help. First, always anchor Phase I in two sub-phases — Moderates (1885-1905) and Extremists (1905-1917) — and treat them as complementary, not opposing camps. Second, learn five dates by heart: 1885, 1905, 1907, 1909, 1916. Third, use the Lucknow Pact and Champaran Satyagraha as the bridge every Mains answer on Phase II needs to begin with.
Facts cross-verified against Vajiram & Ravi, Testbook, Spectrum's A Brief History of Modern India*, Bipan Chandra's* India's Struggle for Independence*, and the padhai.ai Modern History hub.*
Prelims Questions
Mains Questions
Gajendra Singh Godara
Ex-UPSC Aspirant | Exam Preparation Expert
Gajendra Singh Godara is an IIT Bombay graduate and a UPSC aspirant with 4 attempts, including multiple Prelims and Mains appearances. He specializes in Polity, Modern History, International Relations, and Economy. At PadhAI, Gajendra leverages his firsthand exam experience to simplify complex concepts, creating high-efficiency study materials that help aspirants save time and stay focused.
No comments yet. Be the first to join the discussion!
